Naive Bayes is popular due to its efficiency, direct theoretical foundation and strong classification performance. My techniques improve its accuracy by overcoming the deficiencies of its attribute independence assumption.

The AnDE algorithms achieve this without resorting to model selection or search by averaging over all of a class of models that directly map lower-dimensional probabilities to the desired high-dimensional probability. Averaged One Dependence Estimators (AODE) is the best known of the AnDE algorithms. It provides particularly high prediction accuracy with relatively modest computational overheads. The AnDE algorithms learn in a single pass through the data, thus supporting learning from data that is too large to fit in memory. They have complexity that is linear with respect to data quantity. These properties, together with their capacity to accurately model high-dimensional probability distributions, make them an extremely attractive option for large data.

An alternative approach is provided by Lazy Bayesian Rules (LBR) which does perform model selection. It provides very high prediction accuracy for large training sets, and is computationally efficient when few objects are to be classified for each training set.

Selective AnDE refines AnDE models requiring only a single additional pass through the data.

Selective KDB learns highly accurate models from large quantities of data in just three passes through the data.

AnDE, Selective AnDE and Selective KDB can all operate out-of-core, and thus support learning from very large data.

WANBIA and its variants WANBIA-C and ALR add discriminately learned weights to generatively learned linear models, greatly improving accuracy relative to pure generative learning and learning time relative to pure disciminative learning.

There have been many scientific applications of AODE.

An AnDE package for Weka is available here.

An AnDE package for R is available here.

The following are standard components in Weka:

- AODE, which is AnDE with n=1.
- AODEsr, which is AODE with subsumption resolution.
- LBR, Lazy Bayesian Rules.

An open source C++ implementation of Selective KDB can be downloaded here.

An open source C++ implementation of Sample-base Selective Attribute ANDE can be downloaded here.

Selective AnDE for large data learning: a low-bias memory constrained approach.

Chen, S., Martínez, A. M., Webb, G. I., & Wang, L.

Knowledge and Information Systems, 50(2), 475-503, 2017.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{ChenEtAl16,
Title = {Selective AnDE for large data learning: a low-bias memory constrained approach},
Author = {Chen, Shenglei
and Mart{\'i}nez, Ana M.
and Webb, Geoffrey I.
and Wang, Limin},
Journal = {Knowledge and Information Systems},
Year = {2017},
Number = {2},
Pages = {475-503},
Volume = {50},
Abstract = {Learning from data that are too big to fit into memory poses great challenges to currently available learning approaches. Averaged n-Dependence Estimators (AnDE) allows for a flexible learning from out-of-core data, by varying the value of n (number of super parents). Hence, AnDE is especially appropriate for learning from large quantities of data. Memory requirement in AnDE, however, increases combinatorially with the number of attributes and the parameter n. In large data learning, number of attributes is often large and we also expect high n to achieve low-bias classification. In order to achieve the lower bias of AnDE with higher n but with less memory requirement, we propose a memory constrained selective AnDE algorithm, in which two passes of learning through training examples are involved. The first pass performs attribute selection on super parents according to available memory, whereas the second one learns an AnDE model with parents only on the selected attributes. Extensive experiments show that the new selective AnDE has considerably lower bias and prediction error relative to A \$\$n'\$\$ n {\textasciiacutex} DE, where \$\$n' = n-1\$\$ n {\textasciiacutex} = n - 1 , while maintaining the same space complexity and similar time complexity. The proposed algorithm works well on categorical data. Numerical data sets need to be discretized first.},
Doi = {10.1007/s10115-016-0937-9},
ISSN = {0219-3116},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE and Learning from large datasets and DP140100087},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Learning from data that are too big to fit into memory poses great challenges to currently available learning approaches. Averaged n-Dependence Estimators (AnDE) allows for a flexible learning from out-of-core data, by varying the value of n (number of super parents). Hence, AnDE is especially appropriate for learning from large quantities of data. Memory requirement in AnDE, however, increases combinatorially with the number of attributes and the parameter n. In large data learning, number of attributes is often large and we also expect high n to achieve low-bias classification. In order to achieve the lower bias of AnDE with higher n but with less memory requirement, we propose a memory constrained selective AnDE algorithm, in which two passes of learning through training examples are involved. The first pass performs attribute selection on super parents according to available memory, whereas the second one learns an AnDE model with parents only on the selected attributes. Extensive experiments show that the new selective AnDE has considerably lower bias and prediction error relative to A \$\$n'\$\$ n {\textasciiacutex} DE, where \$\$n' = n-1\$\$ n {\textasciiacutex} = n - 1 , while maintaining the same space complexity and similar time complexity. The proposed algorithm works well on categorical data. Numerical data sets need to be discretized first.

Sample-based Attribute Selective AnDE for Large Data.

Chen, S., Martinez, A., Webb, G., & Wang, L.

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(1), 172-185, 2017.

[Bibtex]

**ABSTRACT**

Efficient Parameter Learning of Bayesian Network Classifiers.

Zaidi, N., Webb, G. I., Carman, M., Petitjean, F., Buntine, W., Hynes, H., & De Sterck, H.

Machine Learning, 106(9-10), 2017.

[Bibtex]

**ABSTRACT**

Scalable Learning of Bayesian Network Classifiers.

Martinez, A. M., Webb, G. I., Chen, S., & Zaidi, N. A.

Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(44), 1-35, 2016.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{MartinezEtAl16,
Title = {Scalable Learning of {Bayesian} Network Classifiers},
Author = {Ana M. Martinez and Geoffrey I. Webb and Shenglei Chen and Nayyar A. Zaidi},
Journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
Year = {2016},
Number = {44},
Pages = {1-35},
Volume = {17},
Abstract = {Ever increasing data quantity makes ever more urgent the need for highly scalable learners that have good classification performance. Therefore, an out-of-core learner with excellent time and space complexity, along with high expressivity (that is, capacity to learn very complex multivariate probability distributions) is extremely desirable. This paper presents such a learner. We propose an extension to the k-dependence Bayesian classifier (KDB) that discriminatively selects a sub- model of a full KDB classifier. It requires only one additional pass through the training data, making it a three-pass learner. Our extensive experimental evaluation on 16 large data sets reveals that this out-of-core algorithm achieves competitive classification performance, and substantially better training and classification time than state-of-the-art in-core learners such as random forest and linear and non-linear logistic regression.},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE and Learning from large datasets and DP140100087},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data},
Url = {http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/martinez16a.html}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Ever increasing data quantity makes ever more urgent the need for highly scalable learners that have good classification performance. Therefore, an out-of-core learner with excellent time and space complexity, along with high expressivity (that is, capacity to learn very complex multivariate probability distributions) is extremely desirable. This paper presents such a learner. We propose an extension to the k-dependence Bayesian classifier (KDB) that discriminatively selects a sub- model of a full KDB classifier. It requires only one additional pass through the training data, making it a three-pass learner. Our extensive experimental evaluation on 16 large data sets reveals that this out-of-core algorithm achieves competitive classification performance, and substantially better training and classification time than state-of-the-art in-core learners such as random forest and linear and non-linear logistic regression.

Preconditioning an Artificial Neural Network Using Naive Bayes.

Zaidi, N. A., Petitjean, F., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the 20th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, PAKDD 2016, pp. 341-353, 2016.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ZaidiEtAl16,
Title = {Preconditioning an Artificial Neural Network Using Naive {Bayes}},
Author = {Zaidi, Nayyar A.
and Petitjean, Fran{\c{c}}ois
and Webb, Geoffrey I.},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th {Pacific-Asia} Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, {PAKDD} 2016},
Year = {2016},
Editor = {Bailey, James
and Khan, Latifur
and Washio, Takashi
and Dobbie, Gill
and Huang, Zhexue Joshua
and Wang, Ruili},
Pages = {341-353},
Publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
Abstract = {Logistic Regression (LR) is a workhorse of the statistics community and a state-of-the-art machine learning classifier. It learns a linear model from inputs to outputs trained by optimizing the Conditional Log-Likelihood (CLL) of the data. Recently, it has been shown that preconditioning LR using a Naive Bayes (NB) model speeds up LR learning many-fold. One can, however, train a linear model by optimizing the mean-square-error (MSE) instead of CLL. This leads to an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with no hidden layer. In this work, we study the effect of NB preconditioning on such an ANN classifier. Optimizing MSE instead of CLL may lead to a lower bias classifier and hence result in better performance on big datasets. We show that this NB preconditioning can speed-up convergence significantly. We also show that optimizing a linear model with MSE leads to a lower bias classifier than optimizing with CLL. We also compare the performance to state-of-the-art classifier Random Forest.},
Doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-31753-3_28},
ISBN = {978-3-319-31753-3},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and WANBIA and DP140100087},
Related = {combining-generative-and-discriminative-learning},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31753-3_28}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Logistic Regression (LR) is a workhorse of the statistics community and a state-of-the-art machine learning classifier. It learns a linear model from inputs to outputs trained by optimizing the Conditional Log-Likelihood (CLL) of the data. Recently, it has been shown that preconditioning LR using a Naive Bayes (NB) model speeds up LR learning many-fold. One can, however, train a linear model by optimizing the mean-square-error (MSE) instead of CLL. This leads to an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with no hidden layer. In this work, we study the effect of NB preconditioning on such an ANN classifier. Optimizing MSE instead of CLL may lead to a lower bias classifier and hence result in better performance on big datasets. We show that this NB preconditioning can speed-up convergence significantly. We also show that optimizing a linear model with MSE leads to a lower bias classifier than optimizing with CLL. We also compare the performance to state-of-the-art classifier Random Forest.

ALRn: Accelerated higher-order logistic regression.

Zaidi, N. A., Webb, G. I., Carman, M. J., Petitjean, F., & Cerquides, J.

Machine Learning, 104(2), 151-194, 2016.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{ZaidiEtAl16b,
Title = {{ALRn}: Accelerated higher-order logistic regression},
Author = {Zaidi, Nayyar A.
and Webb, Geoffrey I.
and Carman, Mark J.
and Petitjean, Fran{\c{c}}ois
and Cerquides, Jes{\'u}s},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2016},
Number = {2},
Pages = {151-194},
Volume = {104},
Abstract = {This paper introduces Accelerated Logistic Regression: a hybrid generative-discriminative approach to training Logistic Regression with high-order features. We present two main results: (1) that our combined generative-discriminative approach significantly improves the efficiency of Logistic Regression and (2) that incorporating higher order features (i.e. features that are the Cartesian products of the original features) reduces the bias of Logistic Regression, which in turn significantly reduces its error on large datasets. We assess the efficacy of Accelerated Logistic Regression by conducting an extensive set of experiments on 75 standard datasets. We demonstrate its competitiveness, particularly on large datasets, by comparing against state-of-the-art classifiers including Random Forest and Averaged n-Dependence Estimators.},
Doi = {10.1007/s10994-016-5574-8},
ISSN = {1573-0565},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and WANBIA and DP140100087},
Related = {combining-generative-and-discriminative-learning},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-016-5574-8}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** This paper introduces Accelerated Logistic Regression: a hybrid generative-discriminative approach to training Logistic Regression with high-order features. We present two main results: (1) that our combined generative-discriminative approach significantly improves the efficiency of Logistic Regression and (2) that incorporating higher order features (i.e. features that are the Cartesian products of the original features) reduces the bias of Logistic Regression, which in turn significantly reduces its error on large datasets. We assess the efficacy of Accelerated Logistic Regression by conducting an extensive set of experiments on 75 standard datasets. We demonstrate its competitiveness, particularly on large datasets, by comparing against state-of-the-art classifiers including Random Forest and Averaged n-Dependence Estimators.

Naive-Bayes Inspired Effective Pre-Conditioner for Speeding-up Logistic Regression.

Zaidi, N., Carman, M., Cerquides, J., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 1097-1102, 2014.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ZaidiEtAl14,
Title = {Naive-{Bayes} Inspired Effective Pre-Conditioner for Speeding-up Logistic Regression},
Author = {N. Zaidi and M. Carman and J. Cerquides and G.I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 14th {IEEE} International Conference on Data Mining},
Year = {2014},
Pages = {1097-1102},
Abstract = {We propose an alternative parameterization of
Logistic Regression (LR) for the categorical data, multi-class
setting. LR optimizes the conditional log-likelihood over the
training data and is based on an iterative optimization procedure
to tune this objective function. The optimization procedure
employed may be sensitive to scale and hence an effective
pre-conditioning method is recommended. Many problems in
machine learning involve arbitrary scales or categorical data
(where simple standardization of features is not applicable).
The problem can be alleviated by using optimization routines
that are invariant to scale such as (second-order) Newton
methods. However, computing and inverting the Hessian is a
costly procedure and not feasible for big data. Thus one must
often rely on first-order methods such as gradient descent (GD),
stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or approximate secondorder
such as quasi-Newton (QN) routines, which are not
invariant to scale. This paper proposes a simple yet effective
pre-conditioner for speeding-up LR based on naive Bayes
conditional probability estimates. The idea is to scale each
attribute by the log of the conditional probability of that
attribute given the class. This formulation substantially speeds up
LR's convergence. It also provides a weighted naive Bayes
formulation which yields an effective framework for hybrid
generative-discriminative classification.},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and WANBIA and DP140100087},
Related = {combining-generative-and-discriminative-learning},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2014.53}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** We propose an alternative parameterization of Logistic Regression (LR) for the categorical data, multi-class setting. LR optimizes the conditional log-likelihood over the training data and is based on an iterative optimization procedure to tune this objective function. The optimization procedure employed may be sensitive to scale and hence an effective pre-conditioning method is recommended. Many problems in machine learning involve arbitrary scales or categorical data (where simple standardization of features is not applicable). The problem can be alleviated by using optimization routines that are invariant to scale such as (second-order) Newton methods. However, computing and inverting the Hessian is a costly procedure and not feasible for big data. Thus one must often rely on first-order methods such as gradient descent (GD), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or approximate secondorder such as quasi-Newton (QN) routines, which are not invariant to scale. This paper proposes a simple yet effective pre-conditioner for speeding-up LR based on naive Bayes conditional probability estimates. The idea is to scale each attribute by the log of the conditional probability of that attribute given the class. This formulation substantially speeds up LR's convergence. It also provides a weighted naive Bayes formulation which yields an effective framework for hybrid generative-discriminative classification.

Highly Scalable Attribute Selection for AODE.

Chen, S., Martinez, A., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the 18th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 86-97, 2014.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ChenEtAl14,
Title = {Highly Scalable Attribute Selection for AODE},
Author = {S. Chen and A. Martinez and G.I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 18th {Pacific}-{Asia} Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining},
Year = {2014},
Pages = {86-97},
Abstract = {Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE) is a popular
and effective approach to Bayesian learning. In this paper, a new
attribute selection approach is proposed for AODE. It can search in a
large model space, while it requires only a single extra pass through the
training data, resulting in a computationally efficient two-pass learning
algorithm. The experimental results indicate that the new technique significantly
reduces AODE.s bias at the cost of a modest increase in training
time. Its low bias and computational efficiency make it an attractive
algorithm for learning from big data.},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE and DP140100087},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06605-9_8}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE) is a popular and effective approach to Bayesian learning. In this paper, a new attribute selection approach is proposed for AODE. It can search in a large model space, while it requires only a single extra pass through the training data, resulting in a computationally efficient two-pass learning algorithm. The experimental results indicate that the new technique significantly reduces AODE.s bias at the cost of a modest increase in training time. Its low bias and computational efficiency make it an attractive algorithm for learning from big data.

Alleviating Naive Bayes Attribute Independence Assumption by Attribute Weighting.

Zaidi, N. A., Cerquides, J., Carman, M. J., & Webb, G. I.

Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 1947-1988, 2013.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{Zaidi2013,
Title = {Alleviating Naive Bayes Attribute Independence Assumption by Attribute Weighting},
Author = {Nayyar A. Zaidi and Jesus Cerquides and Mark J. Carman and Geoffrey I. Webb},
Journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
Year = {2013},
Pages = {1947-1988},
Volume = {14},
Abstract = {Despite the simplicity of the Naive Bayes classifier, it has continued to perform well against more sophisticated newcomers and has remained, therefore, of great interest to the machine learning community. Of numerous approaches to refining the naive Bayes classifier, attribute weighting has received less attention than it warrants. Most approaches, perhaps influenced by attribute weighting in other machine learning algorithms, use weighting to place more emphasis on highly predictive attributes than those that are less predictive. In this paper, we argue that for naive Bayes attribute weighting should instead be used to alleviate the conditional independence assumption. Based on this premise, we propose a weighted naive Bayes algorithm, called WANBIA, that selects weights to minimize either the negative conditional log likelihood or the mean squared error objective functions. We perform extensive evaluations and find that WANBIA is a competitive alternative to state of the art classifiers like Random Forest, Logistic Regression and A1DE.},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and WANBIA},
Related = {combining-generative-and-discriminative-learning},
Url = {http://jmlr.org/papers/volume14/zaidi13a/zaidi13a.pdf},
Urltext = {Link to paper on JMLR site}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Despite the simplicity of the Naive Bayes classifier, it has continued to perform well against more sophisticated newcomers and has remained, therefore, of great interest to the machine learning community. Of numerous approaches to refining the naive Bayes classifier, attribute weighting has received less attention than it warrants. Most approaches, perhaps influenced by attribute weighting in other machine learning algorithms, use weighting to place more emphasis on highly predictive attributes than those that are less predictive. In this paper, we argue that for naive Bayes attribute weighting should instead be used to alleviate the conditional independence assumption. Based on this premise, we propose a weighted naive Bayes algorithm, called WANBIA, that selects weights to minimize either the negative conditional log likelihood or the mean squared error objective functions. We perform extensive evaluations and find that WANBIA is a competitive alternative to state of the art classifiers like Random Forest, Logistic Regression and A1DE.

Fast and Effective Single Pass Bayesian Learning.

Zaidi, N., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the 17th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 149-160, 2013.

[Bibtex]

```
@InProceedings{ZaidiWebb13,
Title = {Fast and Effective Single Pass Bayesian Learning},
Author = {N. Zaidi and G. I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th {Pacific}-{Asia} Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining},
Year = {2013},
Pages = {149-160},
Doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-37453-1_13},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT**

Non-Disjoint Discretization for Aggregating One-Dependence Estimator Classifiers.

Martinez, A., Webb, G. I., Flores, M., & Gamez, J.

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems, Berlin / Heidelberg, pp. 151-162, 2012.

[Bibtex]

```
@InProceedings{MartinezEtAl12,
Title = {Non-Disjoint Discretization for Aggregating One-Dependence Estimator Classifiers},
Author = {A. Martinez and G. I. Webb and M. Flores and J. Gamez},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems},
Year = {2012},
Address = {Berlin / Heidelberg},
Pages = {151-162},
Publisher = {Springer},
ISBN = {978-3-642-28930-9},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE and discretization for naive bayes},
Related = {discretization-for-naive-bayes}
}
```

**ABSTRACT**

Learning by extrapolation from marginal to full-multivariate probability distributions: Decreasingly naive Bayesian classification.

Webb, G. I., Boughton, J., Zheng, F., Ting, K. M., & Salem, H.

Machine Learning, 86(2), 233-272, 2012.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{WebbEtAl12,
Title = {Learning by extrapolation from marginal to full-multivariate probability distributions: Decreasingly naive {Bayesian} classification},
Author = {G.I. Webb and J. Boughton and F. Zheng and K.M. Ting and H. Salem},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2012},
Number = {2},
Pages = {233-272},
Volume = {86},
Abstract = {Averaged n-Dependence Estimators (AnDE) is an approach to probabilistic classification learning that learns by extrapolation from marginal
to full-multivariate probability distributions. It utilizes a single parameter that transforms the approach between a low-variance high-bias learner
(Naive Bayes) and a high-variance low-bias learner with Bayes optimal
asymptotic error. It extends the underlying strategy of Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE), which relaxes the Naive Bayes independence assumption while retaining many of Naive Bayes' desirable computational and theoretical properties. AnDE further relaxes the independence assumption by generalizing AODE to higher-levels of dependence.
Extensive experimental evaluation shows that the bias-variance trade-off
for Averaged 2-Dependence Estimators results in strong predictive accuracy over a wide range of data sets. It has training time linear with
respect to the number of examples, supports incremental learning, handles directly missing values, and is robust in the face of noise. Beyond
the practical utility of its lower-dimensional variants, AnDE is of interest
in that it demonstrates that it is possible to create low-bias high-variance
generative learners and suggests strategies for developing even more powerful classifiers.},
Address = {Netherlands},
ISSN = {0885-6125},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Publisher = {Springer},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-011-5263-6},
Urltext = {Link to paper via SpringerLink}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Averaged n-Dependence Estimators (AnDE) is an approach to probabilistic classification learning that learns by extrapolation from marginal to full-multivariate probability distributions. It utilizes a single parameter that transforms the approach between a low-variance high-bias learner (Naive Bayes) and a high-variance low-bias learner with Bayes optimal asymptotic error. It extends the underlying strategy of Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE), which relaxes the Naive Bayes independence assumption while retaining many of Naive Bayes' desirable computational and theoretical properties. AnDE further relaxes the independence assumption by generalizing AODE to higher-levels of dependence. Extensive experimental evaluation shows that the bias-variance trade-off for Averaged 2-Dependence Estimators results in strong predictive accuracy over a wide range of data sets. It has training time linear with respect to the number of examples, supports incremental learning, handles directly missing values, and is robust in the face of noise. Beyond the practical utility of its lower-dimensional variants, AnDE is of interest in that it demonstrates that it is possible to create low-bias high-variance generative learners and suggests strategies for developing even more powerful classifiers.

Techniques for Efficient Learning without Search.

Salem, H., Suraweera, P., Webb, G. I., & Boughton, J. R.

Proceedings of the 16th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2012, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 50-61, 2012.

[Bibtex]

```
@InProceedings{SalemEtAl12,
Title = {Techniques for Efficient Learning without Search},
Author = {H. Salem and P. Suraweera and G.I. Webb and J.R. Boughton},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th {Pacific}-{Asia} Conference, PAKDD 2012},
Year = {2012},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Pages = {50-61},
Publisher = {Springer},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Location = {Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data},
Url = {http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-30217-6_5}
}
```

**ABSTRACT**

Subsumption Resolution: An Efficient and Effective Technique for Semi-Naive Bayesian Learning.

Zheng, F., Webb, G. I., Suraweera, P., & Zhu, L.

Machine Learning, 87(1), 93-125, 2012.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{ZhengEtAl12,
Title = {Subsumption Resolution: An Efficient and Effective Technique for Semi-Naive Bayesian Learning},
Author = {F. Zheng and G.I. Webb and P. Suraweera and L. Zhu},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2012},
Number = {1},
Pages = {93-125},
Volume = {87},
Abstract = {Semi-naive Bayesian techniques seek to improve the accuracy of naive
Bayes (NB) by relaxing the attribute independence assumption. We present a new
type of semi-naive Bayesian operation, Subsumption Resolution (SR), which efficiently identifies occurrences of the specialization-generalization relationship and
eliminates generalizations at classification time.We extend SR to Near-Subsumption
Resolution (NSR) to delete near.generalizations in addition to generalizations. We
develop two versions of SR: one that performs SR during training, called eager SR
(ESR), and another that performs SR during testing, called lazy SR (LSR).We inves-
tigate the effect of ESR, LSR, NSR and conventional attribute elimination (BSE) on
NB and Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE), a powerful alternative to
NB. BSE imposes very high training time overheads on NB and AODE accompanied
by varying decreases in classification time overheads. ESR, LSR and NSR impose
high training time and test time overheads on NB. However, LSR imposes no extra
training time overheads and only modest test time overheads on AODE, while ESR
and NSR impose modest training and test time overheads on AODE. Our extensive
experimental comparison on sixty UCI data sets shows that applying BSE, LSR or
NSR to NB significantly improves both zero-one loss and RMSE, while applying
BSE, ESR or NSR to AODE significantly improves zero-one loss and RMSE and
applying LSR to AODE significantly improves zero-one loss. The Friedman test and
Nemenyi test show that AODE with ESR or NSR have a significant zero-one loss and
RMSE advantage over Logistic Regression and a zero-one loss advantage overWeka.s
LibSVM implementation with a grid parameter search on categorical data. AODE
with LSR has a zero-one loss advantage over Logistic Regression and comparable
zero-one loss with LibSVM. Finally, we examine the circumstances under which the
elimination of near-generalizations proves beneficial.},
Address = {Netherlands},
Doi = {10.1007/s10994-011-5275-2},
ISSN = {0885-6125},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Publisher = {Springer},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data},
Urltext = {Link to paper via SpringerLink}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Semi-naive Bayesian techniques seek to improve the accuracy of naive Bayes (NB) by relaxing the attribute independence assumption. We present a new type of semi-naive Bayesian operation, Subsumption Resolution (SR), which efficiently identifies occurrences of the specialization-generalization relationship and eliminates generalizations at classification time.We extend SR to Near-Subsumption Resolution (NSR) to delete near.generalizations in addition to generalizations. We develop two versions of SR: one that performs SR during training, called eager SR (ESR), and another that performs SR during testing, called lazy SR (LSR).We inves- tigate the effect of ESR, LSR, NSR and conventional attribute elimination (BSE) on NB and Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE), a powerful alternative to NB. BSE imposes very high training time overheads on NB and AODE accompanied by varying decreases in classification time overheads. ESR, LSR and NSR impose high training time and test time overheads on NB. However, LSR imposes no extra training time overheads and only modest test time overheads on AODE, while ESR and NSR impose modest training and test time overheads on AODE. Our extensive experimental comparison on sixty UCI data sets shows that applying BSE, LSR or NSR to NB significantly improves both zero-one loss and RMSE, while applying BSE, ESR or NSR to AODE significantly improves zero-one loss and RMSE and applying LSR to AODE significantly improves zero-one loss. The Friedman test and Nemenyi test show that AODE with ESR or NSR have a significant zero-one loss and RMSE advantage over Logistic Regression and a zero-one loss advantage overWeka.s LibSVM implementation with a grid parameter search on categorical data. AODE with LSR has a zero-one loss advantage over Logistic Regression and comparable zero-one loss with LibSVM. Finally, we examine the circumstances under which the elimination of near-generalizations proves beneficial.

Anytime Classification for a Pool of Instances.

Hui, B., Yang, Y., & Webb, G. I.

Machine Learning, 77(1), 61-102, 2009.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{HuiYangWebb09,
Title = {Anytime Classification for a Pool of Instances},
Author = {B. Hui and Y. Yang and G.I. Webb},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2009},
Number = {1},
Pages = {61-102},
Volume = {77},
Abstract = {In many real-world applications of classification learning, such as
credit card transaction vetting or classification embedded in sensor
nodes, multiple instances simultaneously require classification under
computational resource constraints such as limited time or limited
battery capacity. In such a situation, available computational
resources should be allocated across the instances in order to
optimize the overall classification efficacy and efficiency. We
propose a novel anytime classification framework, Scheduling Anytime
Averaged Probabilistic Estimators (SAAPE), which is capable of
classifying a pool of instances, delivering accurate results whenever
interrupted and optimizing the collective classification
performance. Following the practice of our previous anytime
classification system AAPE, SAAPE runs a sequence of very efficient
Bayesian probabilistic classifiers to classify each single
instance. Furthermore, SAAPE implements seven alternative scheduling
schemes to decide which instance gets available computational
resources next such that a new classifier can be applied to refine its
classification. We formally present each scheduling scheme's
definition, rationale and time complexity. We conduct large-scale
experiments using 60 benchmark data sets and diversified statistical
tests to evaluate SAAPE's performance on zero-one loss classification
as well as on probability estimation. We analyze each scheduling
scheme's advantage and disadvantage according to both theoretical
understandings and empirical observations. Consequently we identify
effective scheduling schemes that enable SAAPE to accomplish accurate
anytime classification for a pool of instances.},
Address = {Netherlands},
Audit-trail = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-009-5118-6},
Doi = {10.1007/s10994-009-5118-6},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Publisher = {Springer},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** In many real-world applications of classification learning, such as credit card transaction vetting or classification embedded in sensor nodes, multiple instances simultaneously require classification under computational resource constraints such as limited time or limited battery capacity. In such a situation, available computational resources should be allocated across the instances in order to optimize the overall classification efficacy and efficiency. We propose a novel anytime classification framework, Scheduling Anytime Averaged Probabilistic Estimators (SAAPE), which is capable of classifying a pool of instances, delivering accurate results whenever interrupted and optimizing the collective classification performance. Following the practice of our previous anytime classification system AAPE, SAAPE runs a sequence of very efficient Bayesian probabilistic classifiers to classify each single instance. Furthermore, SAAPE implements seven alternative scheduling schemes to decide which instance gets available computational resources next such that a new classifier can be applied to refine its classification. We formally present each scheduling scheme's definition, rationale and time complexity. We conduct large-scale experiments using 60 benchmark data sets and diversified statistical tests to evaluate SAAPE's performance on zero-one loss classification as well as on probability estimation. We analyze each scheduling scheme's advantage and disadvantage according to both theoretical understandings and empirical observations. Consequently we identify effective scheduling schemes that enable SAAPE to accomplish accurate anytime classification for a pool of instances.

Discretization for Naive-Bayes Learning: Managing Discretization Bias and Variance.

Yang, Y., & Webb, G. I.

Machine Learning, 74(1), 39-74, 2009.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{YangWebb09,
Title = {Discretization for Naive-Bayes Learning: Managing Discretization Bias and Variance},
Author = {Y. Yang and G.I. Webb},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2009},
Number = {1},
Pages = {39-74},
Volume = {74},
Abstract = {Quantitative attributes are usually discretized in Naive-Bayes learning. We establish simple conditions under which discretization is equivalent to use of the true probability density function during naive-Bayes learning. The use of different discretization techniques can be expected to affect the classification bias and variance of generated naive-Bayes classifiers, effects we name discretization bias and variance. We argue that by properly managing discretization bias and variance, we can effectively reduce naive-Bayes classification error. In particular, we supply insights into managing discretization bias and variance by adjusting the number of intervals and the number of training instances contained in each interval. We accordingly propose proportional discretization and fixed frequency discretization, two efficient unsupervised discretization methods that are able to effectively manage discretization bias and variance. We evaluate our new techniques against four key discretization methods for naive-Bayes classifiers. The experimental results support our theoretical analyses by showing that with statistically significant frequency, naive-Bayes classifiers trained on data discretized by our new methods are able to achieve lower classification error than those trained on data discretized by current established discretization methods.},
Address = {Netherlands},
Audit-trail = {DOI 10.1007/s10994-008-5083-5},
Doi = {10.1007/s10994-008-5083-5},
Keywords = {Discretization for Naive Bayes and Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Publisher = {Springer},
Related = {discretization-for-naive-bayes}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Quantitative attributes are usually discretized in Naive-Bayes learning. We establish simple conditions under which discretization is equivalent to use of the true probability density function during naive-Bayes learning. The use of different discretization techniques can be expected to affect the classification bias and variance of generated naive-Bayes classifiers, effects we name discretization bias and variance. We argue that by properly managing discretization bias and variance, we can effectively reduce naive-Bayes classification error. In particular, we supply insights into managing discretization bias and variance by adjusting the number of intervals and the number of training instances contained in each interval. We accordingly propose proportional discretization and fixed frequency discretization, two efficient unsupervised discretization methods that are able to effectively manage discretization bias and variance. We evaluate our new techniques against four key discretization methods for naive-Bayes classifiers. The experimental results support our theoretical analyses by showing that with statistically significant frequency, naive-Bayes classifiers trained on data discretized by our new methods are able to achieve lower classification error than those trained on data discretized by current established discretization methods.

A Comparative Study of Bandwidth Choice in Kernel Density Estimation for Naive Bayesian Classification.

Liu, B., Yang, Y., Webb, G. I., & Boughton, J.

Proceedings of the 13th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2009, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 302-313, 2009.

[Bibtex]

```
@InProceedings{LiuYangWebbBoughton09,
Title = {A Comparative Study of Bandwidth Choice in Kernel Density Estimation for Naive Bayesian Classification},
Author = {B. Liu and Y. Yang and G.I. Webb and J. Boughton},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 13th {Pacific}-{Asia} Conference, PAKDD 2009},
Year = {2009},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Pages = {302-313},
Publisher = {Springer},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE and Discretization for Naive Bayes},
Location = {Bangkok, Thailand},
Related = {discretization-for-naive-bayes},
Url = {http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-01307-2_29}
}
```

**ABSTRACT**

To Select or To Weigh: A Comparative Study of Linear Combination Schemes for SuperParent-One-Dependence Estimators.

Yang, Y., Webb, G. I., Cerquides, J., Korb, K., Boughton, J., & Ting, K-M.

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(12), 1652-1665, 2007.

[Bibtex]

**ABSTRACT**

Classifying under Computational Resource Constraints: Anytime Classification Using Probabilistic Estimators.

Yang, Y., Webb, G. I., Korb, K., & Ting, K-M.

Machine Learning, 69(1), 35-53, 2007.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{YangWebbKorbTing07,
Title = {Classifying under Computational Resource Constraints: Anytime Classification Using Probabilistic Estimators},
Author = {Y. Yang and G.I. Webb and K. Korb and K-M. Ting},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2007},
Number = {1},
Pages = {35-53},
Volume = {69},
Abstract = {In many online applications of machine learning, the computational resources available for classification will vary from time to time. Most techniques are designed to operate within the constraints of the minimum expected resources and fail to utilize further resources when they are available. We propose a novel anytime classification algorithm, anytime averaged probabilistic estimators (AAPE), which is capable of delivering strong prediction accuracy with little CPU time and utilizing additional CPU time to increase classification accuracy. The idea is to run an ordered sequence of very efficient Bayesian probabilistic estimators (single improvement steps) until classification time runs out. Theoretical studies and empirical validations reveal that by properly identifying, ordering, invoking and ensembling single improvement steps, AAPE is able to accomplish accurate classification whenever it is interrupted. It is also able to output class probability estimates beyond simple 0/1-loss classifications, as well as adeptly handle incremental learning.},
Address = {Netherlands},
Audit-trail = {DOI 10.1007/s10994-007-5020-z},
Doi = {10.1007/s10994-007-5020-z},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Publisher = {Springer},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** In many online applications of machine learning, the computational resources available for classification will vary from time to time. Most techniques are designed to operate within the constraints of the minimum expected resources and fail to utilize further resources when they are available. We propose a novel anytime classification algorithm, anytime averaged probabilistic estimators (AAPE), which is capable of delivering strong prediction accuracy with little CPU time and utilizing additional CPU time to increase classification accuracy. The idea is to run an ordered sequence of very efficient Bayesian probabilistic estimators (single improvement steps) until classification time runs out. Theoretical studies and empirical validations reveal that by properly identifying, ordering, invoking and ensembling single improvement steps, AAPE is able to accomplish accurate classification whenever it is interrupted. It is also able to output class probability estimates beyond simple 0/1-loss classifications, as well as adeptly handle incremental learning.

Finding the Right Family: Parent and Child Selection for Averaged One-Dependence Estimators.

Zheng, F., & Webb, G. I.

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4710: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML’07), Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 490-501, 2007.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ZhengWebb07,
Title = {Finding the Right Family: Parent and Child Selection for Averaged One-Dependence Estimators},
Author = {F. Zheng and G.I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4710: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML'07)},
Year = {2007},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Pages = {490-501},
Publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
Abstract = {Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE) classifies by uniformly aggregating all qualified one-dependence estimators (ODEs). Its capacity to significantly improve naive Bayes' accuracy without undue time complexity has attracted substantial interest. Forward Sequential Selection and Backwards Sequential Elimination are effective wrapper techniques to identify and repair harmful interdependencies which have been profitably applied to naive Bayes. However, their straightforward application to AODE has previously proved ineffective. We investigate novel variants of these strategies. Our extensive experiments show that elimination of child attributes from within the constituent ODEs results in a significant improvement in probability estimate and reductions in bias and error relative to unmodified AODE. In contrast, elimination of complete constituent ODEs and the four types of attribute addition are found to be less effective and do not demonstrate any strong advantage over AODE. These surprising results lead to effective techniques for improving AODE's prediction accuracy.},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Location = {Warsaw, Poland},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE) classifies by uniformly aggregating all qualified one-dependence estimators (ODEs). Its capacity to significantly improve naive Bayes' accuracy without undue time complexity has attracted substantial interest. Forward Sequential Selection and Backwards Sequential Elimination are effective wrapper techniques to identify and repair harmful interdependencies which have been profitably applied to naive Bayes. However, their straightforward application to AODE has previously proved ineffective. We investigate novel variants of these strategies. Our extensive experiments show that elimination of child attributes from within the constituent ODEs results in a significant improvement in probability estimate and reductions in bias and error relative to unmodified AODE. In contrast, elimination of complete constituent ODEs and the four types of attribute addition are found to be less effective and do not demonstrate any strong advantage over AODE. These surprising results lead to effective techniques for improving AODE's prediction accuracy.

Incremental Discretization for Naive-Bayes Classifier.

Lu, J., Yang, Y., & Webb, G. I.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4093: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2006), Berlin, pp. 223-238, 2006.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

**ABSTRACT** Naive-Bayes classifiers (NB) support incremental learning. However, the lack of effective incremental discretization methods has been hindering NB's incremental learning in face of quantitative data. This problem is further compounded by the fact that quantitative data are everywhere, from temperature readings to share prices. In this paper, we present a novel incremental discretization method for NB, incremental flexible frequency discretization (IFFD). IFFD discretizes values of a quantitative attribute into a sequence of intervals of flexible sizes. It allows online insertion and splitting operation on intervals. Theoretical analysis and experimental test are conducted to compare IFFD with alternative methods. Empirical evidence suggests that IFFD is efficient and effective. NB coupled with IFFD achieves a rapport between high learning efficiency and high classification accuracy in the context of incremental learning.

Efficient Lazy Elimination for Averaged One-Dependence Estimators.

Zheng, F., & Webb, G. I.

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 148: The Proceedings of the Twenty-third International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’06), New York, NY, pp. 1113-1120, 2006.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ZhengWebb06,
Title = {Efficient Lazy Elimination for Averaged One-Dependence Estimators},
Author = {F. Zheng and G.I. Webb},
Booktitle = {ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 148: The Proceedings of the Twenty-third International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'06)},
Year = {2006},
Address = {New York, NY},
Editor = { W. Cohen and A. Moore},
Pages = {1113 - 1120},
Publisher = {ACM Press},
Abstract = {Semi-naive Bayesian classifiers seek to retain the numerous strengths of naive Bayes while reducing error by weakening the attribute independence assumption. Backwards Sequential Elimination (BSE) is a wrapper technique for attribute elimination that has proved effective at this task. We explore a new efficient technique, Lazy Elimination (LE), which eliminates highly related attribute-values at classification time without the computational overheads inherent in wrapper techniques. We analyze the effect of LE and BSE on Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE), a state-of-the-art semi-naive Bayesian algorithm. Our extensive experiments show that LE significantly reduces bias and error without undue additional computation, while BSE significantly reduces bias but not error, with high training time complexity. In the context of AODE, LE has a significant advantage over BSE in both computational efficiency and error.},
Audit-trail = {ISBN:1-59593-383-2, DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143984},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Location = {Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data},
Url = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N00547}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Semi-naive Bayesian classifiers seek to retain the numerous strengths of naive Bayes while reducing error by weakening the attribute independence assumption. Backwards Sequential Elimination (BSE) is a wrapper technique for attribute elimination that has proved effective at this task. We explore a new efficient technique, Lazy Elimination (LE), which eliminates highly related attribute-values at classification time without the computational overheads inherent in wrapper techniques. We analyze the effect of LE and BSE on Averaged One-Dependence Estimators (AODE), a state-of-the-art semi-naive Bayesian algorithm. Our extensive experiments show that LE significantly reduces bias and error without undue additional computation, while BSE significantly reduces bias but not error, with high training time complexity. In the context of AODE, LE has a significant advantage over BSE in both computational efficiency and error.

To Select or To Weigh: A Comparative Study of Model Selection and Model Weighing for SPODE Ensembles.

Yang, Y., Webb, G. I., Cerquides, J., Korb, K., Boughton, J., & Ting, K-M.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4212: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML’06), Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 533-544, 2006.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{YangWebbCerquideKorbBoughtonTing06,
Title = {To Select or To Weigh: A Comparative Study of Model Selection and Model Weighing for SPODE Ensembles},
Author = {Y. Yang and G.I. Webb and J. Cerquides and K. Korb and J. Boughton and K-M. Ting},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4212: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML'06)},
Year = {2006},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Editor = {J. Furkranz and T. Scheffer and M. Spiliopoulou},
Pages = {533-544},
Publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
Abstract = {An ensemble of Super-Parent-One-Dependence Estimators (SPODEs) offers a powerful yet simple alternative to naive Bayes classifiers, achieving significantly higher classification accuracy at a moderate cost in classification efficiency. Currently there exist two families of methodologies that ensemble candidate SPODEs for classification. One is to select only helpful SPODEs and uniformly average their probability estimates, a type of model selection. Another is to assign a weight to each SPODE and linearly combine their probability estimates, a methodology named model weighing. This paper presents a theoretical and empirical study comparing model selection and model weighing for ensembling SPODEs. The focus is on maximizing the ensemble's classification accuracy while minimizing its computational time. A number of representative selection and weighing schemes are studied, providing a comprehensive research on this topic and identifying effective schemes that provide alternative trades-offs between speed and expected error},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Location = {Berlin, Germany},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** An ensemble of Super-Parent-One-Dependence Estimators (SPODEs) offers a powerful yet simple alternative to naive Bayes classifiers, achieving significantly higher classification accuracy at a moderate cost in classification efficiency. Currently there exist two families of methodologies that ensemble candidate SPODEs for classification. One is to select only helpful SPODEs and uniformly average their probability estimates, a type of model selection. Another is to assign a weight to each SPODE and linearly combine their probability estimates, a methodology named model weighing. This paper presents a theoretical and empirical study comparing model selection and model weighing for ensembling SPODEs. The focus is on maximizing the ensemble's classification accuracy while minimizing its computational time. A number of representative selection and weighing schemes are studied, providing a comprehensive research on this topic and identifying effective schemes that provide alternative trades-offs between speed and expected error

Not So Naive Bayes: Aggregating One-Dependence Estimators.

Webb, G. I., Boughton, J., & Wang, Z.

Machine Learning, 58(1), 5-24, 2005.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@Article{WebbBoughtonWang05,
Title = {Not So Naive {Bayes}: Aggregating One-Dependence Estimators},
Author = {G. I. Webb and J. Boughton and Z. Wang},
Journal = {Machine Learning},
Year = {2005},
Number = {1},
Pages = {5-24},
Volume = {58},
Abstract = {Of numerous proposals to improve the accuracy of naive Bayes by weakening its attribute independence assumption, both LBR and TAN have demonstrated remarkable error performance. However, both techniques obtain this outcome at a considerable computational cost. We present a new approach to weakening the attribute independence assumption by averaging all of a constrained class of classifiers. In extensive experiments this technique delivers comparable prediction accuracy to LBR and TAN with substantially improved computational efficiency.},
Address = {Netherlands},
Audit-trail = {3/5/04 Pre-print posted},
Doi = {10.1007/s10994-005-4258-6},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Publisher = {Springer},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Of numerous proposals to improve the accuracy of naive Bayes by weakening its attribute independence assumption, both LBR and TAN have demonstrated remarkable error performance. However, both techniques obtain this outcome at a considerable computational cost. We present a new approach to weakening the attribute independence assumption by averaging all of a constrained class of classifiers. In extensive experiments this technique delivers comparable prediction accuracy to LBR and TAN with substantially improved computational efficiency.

A Comparative Study of Semi-naive Bayes Methods in Classification Learning.

Zheng, F., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Data Mining Conference (AusDM05), Sydney, pp. 141-156, 2005.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ZhengWebb05,
Title = {A Comparative Study of Semi-naive Bayes Methods in Classification Learning},
Author = {F. Zheng and G.I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Data Mining Conference (AusDM05)},
Year = {2005},
Address = {Sydney},
Editor = {S.J. Simoff and G.J. Williams and J. Galloway and I. Kolyshkina },
Pages = {141-156},
Publisher = {University of Technology},
Abstract = {Numerous techniques have sought to improve the accuracy of Naive Bayes (NB) by alleviating the attribute interdependence problem. This paper summarizes these semi-naive Bayesian methods into two groups: those that apply conventional NB with a new attribute set, and those that alter NB by allowing inter-dependencies between attributes. We review eight typical semi-naive Bayesian learning algorithms and perform error analysis using the bias-variance decomposition on thirty-six natural domains from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. In analysing the results of these experiments we provide general recommendations for selection between methods.},
Keywords = {AODE and Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Sydney, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Numerous techniques have sought to improve the accuracy of Naive Bayes (NB) by alleviating the attribute interdependence problem. This paper summarizes these semi-naive Bayesian methods into two groups: those that apply conventional NB with a new attribute set, and those that alter NB by allowing inter-dependencies between attributes. We review eight typical semi-naive Bayesian learning algorithms and perform error analysis using the bias-variance decomposition on thirty-six natural domains from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. In analysing the results of these experiments we provide general recommendations for selection between methods.

Selective Augmented Bayesian Network Classifiers Based on Rough Set Theory.

Wang, Z., Webb, G. I., & Zheng, F.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3056: Proceedings of the Eighth Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 04), Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 319-328, 2004.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WangWebbZheng04,
Title = {Selective Augmented Bayesian Network Classifiers Based on Rough Set Theory},
Author = {Z. Wang and G.I. Webb and F. Zheng},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3056: Proceedings of the Eighth {Pacific}-{Asia} Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 04)},
Year = {2004},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Editor = {H. Dai and R. Srikant and C. Zhang},
Pages = {319-328},
Publisher = {Springer},
Abstract = {The naive Bayes classifier is widely used in interactive applications due to its computational efficiency, direct theoretical base, and competitive accuracy. However, its attribute independence assumption can result in sub-optimal accuracy. A number of techniques have explored simple relaxations of the attribute independence assumption in order to increase accuracy. TAN, Tree-Augmented Naive Bayes, is a state-of-the-art extension of naive Bayes, that can express limited forms of inter-dependence among attributes. Rough sets theory provides tools for expressing inexact or partial dependencies within dataset. In this paper, we present a variant of TAN and compare their tree classifier structures, which can be thought of as a selective restricted trees Bayesian classifier. It delivers lower error than both pre-existing state-of-the-art TAN-based classifiers, with substantially less computation than is required by the SuperParent approach.},
Audit-trail = {PDF posted 23/8},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE and Learning from large datasets},
Location = {Sydney, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** The naive Bayes classifier is widely used in interactive applications due to its computational efficiency, direct theoretical base, and competitive accuracy. However, its attribute independence assumption can result in sub-optimal accuracy. A number of techniques have explored simple relaxations of the attribute independence assumption in order to increase accuracy. TAN, Tree-Augmented Naive Bayes, is a state-of-the-art extension of naive Bayes, that can express limited forms of inter-dependence among attributes. Rough sets theory provides tools for expressing inexact or partial dependencies within dataset. In this paper, we present a variant of TAN and compare their tree classifier structures, which can be thought of as a selective restricted trees Bayesian classifier. It delivers lower error than both pre-existing state-of-the-art TAN-based classifiers, with substantially less computation than is required by the SuperParent approach.

Adjusting Dependence Relations for Semi-Lazy TAN Classifiers.

Wang, Z., Webb, G. I., & Zheng, F.

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2903: Proceedings of the 16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI 03), Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 453-465, 2003.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WangWebbZheng03,
Title = {Adjusting Dependence Relations for Semi-Lazy TAN Classifiers},
Author = {Z. Wang and G.I. Webb and F. Zheng},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2903: Proceedings of the 16th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence ({AI} 03)},
Year = {2003},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Editor = {T.D. Gedeon and L.C.C. Fung },
Pages = {453-465},
Publisher = {Springer},
Abstract = {The naive Bayesian classifier is a simple and effective classification method, which assumes a Bayesian network in which each attribute has the class label as its only one parent. But this assumption is not obviously hold in many real world domains. Tree-Augmented Na?ve Bayes (TAN) is a state-of-the-art extension of the naive Bayes, which can express partial dependence relations among attributes. In this paper, we analyze the implementations of two different TAN classifiers and their tree structures. Experiments show how different dependence relations impact on accuracy of TAN classifiers. We present a kind of semi-lazy TAN classifier, which builds a TAN identical to the original TAN at training time, but adjusts the dependence relations for a new test instance at classification time. Our extensive experimental results show that this kind of semi-lazy classifier delivers lower error than the original TAN and is more efficient than SuperParent TAN.},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Perth, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** The naive Bayesian classifier is a simple and effective classification method, which assumes a Bayesian network in which each attribute has the class label as its only one parent. But this assumption is not obviously hold in many real world domains. Tree-Augmented Na?ve Bayes (TAN) is a state-of-the-art extension of the naive Bayes, which can express partial dependence relations among attributes. In this paper, we analyze the implementations of two different TAN classifiers and their tree structures. Experiments show how different dependence relations impact on accuracy of TAN classifiers. We present a kind of semi-lazy TAN classifier, which builds a TAN identical to the original TAN at training time, but adjusts the dependence relations for a new test instance at classification time. Our extensive experimental results show that this kind of semi-lazy classifier delivers lower error than the original TAN and is more efficient than SuperParent TAN.

A New Restricted Bayesian Network Classifier.

Shi, H., Wang, Z., Webb, G. I., & Huang, H.

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2637: Proceedings of the Seventh Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD’03), Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 265-270, 2003.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ShiWangWebbHuang03,
Title = {A New Restricted Bayesian Network Classifier},
Author = {H. Shi and Z. Wang and G.I. Webb and H. Huang},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2637: Proceedings of the Seventh {Pacific}-{Asia} Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD'03)},
Year = {2003},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Editor = {K-Y. Whang and J. Jeon and K. Shim and J. Srivastava },
Pages = {265-270},
Publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
Abstract = {On the basis of examining the existing restricted Bayesian network classifiers, a new Bayes-theorem-based and more strictly restricted Bayesian-network-based classification model DLBAN is proposed, which can be viewed as a double-level Bayesian network augmented naive Bayes classification. The experimental results show that the DLBAN classifier is better than the TAN classifier in the most cases.},
Audit-trail = {*},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Seoul, Korea},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** On the basis of examining the existing restricted Bayesian network classifiers, a new Bayes-theorem-based and more strictly restricted Bayesian-network-based classification model DLBAN is proposed, which can be viewed as a double-level Bayesian network augmented naive Bayes classification. The experimental results show that the DLBAN classifier is better than the TAN classifier in the most cases.

Averaged One-Dependence Estimators: Preliminary Results.

Webb, G. I., Boughton, J., & Wang, Z.

Proceedings of the First Australasian Data Mining Workshop (AusDM02), Sydney, pp. 65-73, 2002.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WebbBoughtonWang02,
Title = {Averaged One-Dependence Estimators: Preliminary Results},
Author = {G. I. Webb and J. Boughton and Z. Wang},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the First Australasian Data Mining Workshop (AusDM02)},
Year = {2002},
Address = {Sydney},
Editor = {S.J Simoff and G.J Williams and M. Hegland },
Pages = {65-73},
Publisher = {University of Technology},
Abstract = {Naive Bayes is a simple, computationally efficient and remarkably accurate approach to classification learning. These properties have led to its wide deployment in many online applications. However, it is based on an assumption that all attributes are conditionally independent given the class. This assumption leads to decreased accuracy in some applications. AODE overcomes the attribute independence assumption of naive Bayes by averaging over all models in which all attributes depend upon the class and a single other attribute. The resulting classification learning algorithm for nominal data is computationally efficient and achieves very low error rates.},
Audit-trail = {*},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and AODE},
Location = {Canberra, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Naive Bayes is a simple, computationally efficient and remarkably accurate approach to classification learning. These properties have led to its wide deployment in many online applications. However, it is based on an assumption that all attributes are conditionally independent given the class. This assumption leads to decreased accuracy in some applications. AODE overcomes the attribute independence assumption of naive Bayes by averaging over all models in which all attributes depend upon the class and a single other attribute. The resulting classification learning algorithm for nominal data is computationally efficient and achieves very low error rates.

A Heuristic Lazy Bayesian Rules Algorithm.

Wang, Z., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the First Australasian Data Mining Workshop (AusDM02), Sydney, pp. 57-63, 2002.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WangWebb02b,
Title = {A Heuristic Lazy Bayesian Rules Algorithm},
Author = {Z. Wang and G. I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the First Australasian Data Mining Workshop (AusDM02)},
Year = {2002},
Address = {Sydney},
Editor = {S.J Simoff and G.J Williams and M. Hegland },
Pages = {57-63},
Publisher = {University of Technology},
Abstract = {Lazy Bayesian rule has demonstrated outstanding classification accuracy. However, it has high computational overheads when large numbers of instances are classified from a single training set. We compare lazy Bayesian rule and the tree-augmented Bayesian classifier, and present a new heuristic lazy Bayesian rule classifier that combines elements of the two. It requires less computation than lazy Bayesian rule, but demonstrates similar prediction accuracy.},
Audit-trail = {*},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Canberra, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Lazy Bayesian rule has demonstrated outstanding classification accuracy. However, it has high computational overheads when large numbers of instances are classified from a single training set. We compare lazy Bayesian rule and the tree-augmented Bayesian classifier, and present a new heuristic lazy Bayesian rule classifier that combines elements of the two. It requires less computation than lazy Bayesian rule, but demonstrates similar prediction accuracy.

Comparison of Lazy Bayesian Rule Learning and Tree-Augmented Bayesian Learning.

Wang, Z., & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM-2002), Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 775-778, 2002.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WangWebb02,
Title = {Comparison of Lazy Bayesian Rule Learning and Tree-Augmented Bayesian Learning},
Author = { Z. Wang and G.I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the {IEEE} International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM-2002)},
Year = {2002},
Address = {Los Alamitos, CA},
Pages = {775-778},
Publisher = {{IEEE} Computer Society},
Abstract = {The naive Bayes classifier is widely used in interactive applications due to its computational efficiency, direct theoretical base, and competitive accuracy. However, its attribute independence assumption can result in sub-optimal accuracy. A number of techniques have explored simple relaxations of the attribute independence assumption in order to increase accuracy. Among these, Lazy Bayesian Rules (LBR) and Tree-Augmented Na?ve-Bayes (TAN) have demonstrated strong prediction accuracy. However, their relative performance has never been evaluated. This paper compares and contrasts these two techniques, finding that they have comparable accuracy and hence should be selected according to computational profile. LBR is desirable when small numbers of objects are to be classified while TAN is desirable when large numbers of objects are to be classified},
Audit-trail = {http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/icdm/2002/1754/00/1754toc.htm},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Maebashi City, Japan},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** The naive Bayes classifier is widely used in interactive applications due to its computational efficiency, direct theoretical base, and competitive accuracy. However, its attribute independence assumption can result in sub-optimal accuracy. A number of techniques have explored simple relaxations of the attribute independence assumption in order to increase accuracy. Among these, Lazy Bayesian Rules (LBR) and Tree-Augmented Na?ve-Bayes (TAN) have demonstrated strong prediction accuracy. However, their relative performance has never been evaluated. This paper compares and contrasts these two techniques, finding that they have comparable accuracy and hence should be selected according to computational profile. LBR is desirable when small numbers of objects are to be classified while TAN is desirable when large numbers of objects are to be classified

Candidate Elimination Criteria for Lazy Bayesian Rules.

Webb, G. I.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2256: Proceedings of the 14th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI’01), Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 545-556, 2001.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{Webb01b,
Title = {Candidate Elimination Criteria for Lazy Bayesian Rules},
Author = {G. I. Webb},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2256: Proceedings of the 14th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI'01)},
Year = {2001},
Address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
Editor = {M. Stumptner and D. Corbett and M.J. Brooks},
Pages = {545-556},
Publisher = {Springer},
Abstract = {Lazy Bayesian Rules modify naive Bayesian classification to undo elements of the harmful attribute independence assumption. It has been shown to provide classification error comparable to boosting decision trees. This paper explores alternatives to the candidate elimination criterion employed within Lazy Bayesian Rules. Improvements over naive Bayes are consistent so long as the candidate elimination criteria ensures there is sufficient data for accurate probability estimation. However, the original candidate elimination criterion is demonstrated to provide better overall error reduction than the use of a minimum data subset size criterion. },
Audit-trail = {*},
Doi = {10.1007%2F3-540-45656-2_47},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and Bayesian Learning and Lazy Bayesian Rules and Lazy Learning},
Location = {Adelaide, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Lazy Bayesian Rules modify naive Bayesian classification to undo elements of the harmful attribute independence assumption. It has been shown to provide classification error comparable to boosting decision trees. This paper explores alternatives to the candidate elimination criterion employed within Lazy Bayesian Rules. Improvements over naive Bayes are consistent so long as the candidate elimination criteria ensures there is sufficient data for accurate probability estimation. However, the original candidate elimination criterion is demonstrated to provide better overall error reduction than the use of a minimum data subset size criterion.

Implementation of Lazy Bayesian Rules in the Weka System.

Wang, Z., Webb, G. I., & Dai, H.

Software Technology Catering for 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Future Software Technology (ISFST2001), Tokyo, pp. 204-208, 2001.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WangWebbDai01,
Title = {Implementation of Lazy Bayesian Rules in the Weka System},
Author = {Z. Wang and G. I. Webb and H. Dai},
Booktitle = {Software Technology Catering for 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Future Software Technology (ISFST2001)},
Year = {2001},
Address = {Tokyo},
Pages = {204-208},
Publisher = {Software Engineers Association},
Abstract = {The na?ve Bayesian classification algorithms were shown to be computationally efficient and surprisingly accurate when the conditional independence assumption on which they are based is violated. The lazy Bayesian rule is the application of lazy learning techniques to Bayesian tree induction, which supports a weaker conditional attribute independence assumption. The Weka system is a full, industrial-strength implementation of essentially almost the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques, and it contains a framework, in the form of a Java class library, which supports applications that use embedded machine learning and even the implementation of new learning schemes. In this paper, we mainly discuss the implementation of the algorithm of lazy Bayesian rule in Weka System, and introduce all the methods to be used in the Java class. This is the first lazy learning scheme implemented in Weka System.},
Audit-trail = {*},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Zheng Zhou, China},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** The na?ve Bayesian classification algorithms were shown to be computationally efficient and surprisingly accurate when the conditional independence assumption on which they are based is violated. The lazy Bayesian rule is the application of lazy learning techniques to Bayesian tree induction, which supports a weaker conditional attribute independence assumption. The Weka system is a full, industrial-strength implementation of essentially almost the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques, and it contains a framework, in the form of a Java class library, which supports applications that use embedded machine learning and even the implementation of new learning schemes. In this paper, we mainly discuss the implementation of the algorithm of lazy Bayesian rule in Weka System, and introduce all the methods to be used in the Java class. This is the first lazy learning scheme implemented in Weka System.

Lazy Learning of Bayesian Rules.

Zheng, Z., & Webb, G. I.

Machine Learning, 41(1), 53-84, 2000.

[Bibtex]

**ABSTRACT**

Learning Lazy Rules to Improve the Performance of Classifiers.

Ting, K. M., Z. Zheng, & Webb, G. I.

Proceedings of the Nineteenth SGES International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence (ES’99), New York, pp. 122-131, 1999.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{TingZhengWebb99,
Title = {Learning Lazy Rules to Improve the Performance of Classifiers},
Author = {K.M. Ting and Z. Zheng, \& G. I. Webb },
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the Nineteenth SGES International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence (ES'99)},
Year = {1999},
Address = {New York},
Editor = {F. Coenen and A. Macintosh},
Pages = {122-131},
Publisher = {Springer},
Abstract = {Based on an earlier study on lazy Bayesian rule learning, this paper introduces a general lazy learning framework, called LAZYRULE, that begins to learn a rule only when classifying a test case. The objective of the framework is to improve the performance of a base learning algorithm. It has the potential to be used for different types of base learning algorithms. LAZYRULE performs attribute elimination and training case selection using cross-validation to generate the most appropriate rule for each test case. At the consequent of the rule, it applies the base learning algorithm on the selected training subset and the remaining attributes to construct a classifier to make a prediction. This combined action seeks to build a better performing classifier for each test case than the classifier trained using all attributes and all training cases. We show empirically that LAZYRULE improves the performances of naive Bayesian classifiers and majority vote.},
Audit-trail = {*},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation},
Location = {Peterhouse College, Cambridge, UK},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Based on an earlier study on lazy Bayesian rule learning, this paper introduces a general lazy learning framework, called LAZYRULE, that begins to learn a rule only when classifying a test case. The objective of the framework is to improve the performance of a base learning algorithm. It has the potential to be used for different types of base learning algorithms. LAZYRULE performs attribute elimination and training case selection using cross-validation to generate the most appropriate rule for each test case. At the consequent of the rule, it applies the base learning algorithm on the selected training subset and the remaining attributes to construct a classifier to make a prediction. This combined action seeks to build a better performing classifier for each test case than the classifier trained using all attributes and all training cases. We show empirically that LAZYRULE improves the performances of naive Bayesian classifiers and majority vote.

Lazy Bayesian Rules: A Lazy Semi-Naive Bayesian Learning Technique Competitive to Boosting Decision Trees.

Zheng, Z., Webb, G. I., & Ting, K. M.

Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99), San Francisco, pp. 493-502, 1999.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{ZhengWebbTing99,
Title = {Lazy Bayesian Rules: A Lazy Semi-Naive Bayesian Learning Technique Competitive to Boosting Decision Trees},
Author = {Z. Zheng and G. I. Webb and K. M. Ting},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99)},
Year = {1999},
Address = {San Francisco},
Editor = {I. Bratko and S. Dzeroski},
Pages = {493-502},
Publisher = {Morgan Kaufmann},
Abstract = {LBR is a lazy semi-naive Bayesian classifier learning technique, designed to alleviate the attribute interdependence problem of naive Bayesian classification. To classify a test example, it creates a conjunctive rule that selects a most appropriate subset of training examples and induces a local naive Bayesian classifier using this subset. LBR can significantly improve the performance of the naive Bayesian classifier. A bias and variance analysis of LBR reveals that it significantly reduces the bias of naive Bayesian classification at a cost of a slight increase in variance. It is interesting to compare this lazy technique with boosting and bagging, two well-known state-of-the-art non-lazy learning techniques. Empirical comparison of LBR with boosting decision trees on discrete valued data shows that LBR has, on average, significantly lower variance and higher bias. As a result of the interaction of these effects, the average prediction error of LBR over a range of learning tasks is at a level directly comparable to boosting. LBR provides a very competitive discrete valued learning technique where error minimization is the primary concern. It is very efficient when a single classifier is to be applied to classify few cases, such as in a typical incremental learning scenario.},
Audit-trail = {Link via Citeseer},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and Bayesian Learning and Lazy Bayesian Rules and Lazy Learning},
Location = {Bled, Slovenia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** LBR is a lazy semi-naive Bayesian classifier learning technique, designed to alleviate the attribute interdependence problem of naive Bayesian classification. To classify a test example, it creates a conjunctive rule that selects a most appropriate subset of training examples and induces a local naive Bayesian classifier using this subset. LBR can significantly improve the performance of the naive Bayesian classifier. A bias and variance analysis of LBR reveals that it significantly reduces the bias of naive Bayesian classification at a cost of a slight increase in variance. It is interesting to compare this lazy technique with boosting and bagging, two well-known state-of-the-art non-lazy learning techniques. Empirical comparison of LBR with boosting decision trees on discrete valued data shows that LBR has, on average, significantly lower variance and higher bias. As a result of the interaction of these effects, the average prediction error of LBR over a range of learning tasks is at a level directly comparable to boosting. LBR provides a very competitive discrete valued learning technique where error minimization is the primary concern. It is very efficient when a single classifier is to be applied to classify few cases, such as in a typical incremental learning scenario.

Adjusted Probability Naive Bayesian Induction.

Webb, G. I., & Pazzani, M.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1502: Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence, Selected Papers from the Eleventh Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI ’98), Berlin, pp. 285-295, 1998.

[Bibtex] [Abstract]

```
@InProceedings{WebbPazzani98,
Title = {Adjusted Probability Naive Bayesian Induction},
Author = {G. I. Webb and M. Pazzani},
Booktitle = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1502: Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence, Selected Papers from the Eleventh Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI '98)},
Year = {1998},
Address = {Berlin},
Editor = {G. Antoniou and J.K. Slaney},
Pages = {285-295},
Publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
Abstract = {Naive Bayesian classifiers utilise a simple mathematical model for induction. While it is known that the assumptions on which this model is based are frequently violated, the predictive accuracy obtained in discriminate classification tasks is surprisingly competitive in comparison to more complex induction techniques. Adjusted probability naive Bayesian induction adds a simple extension to the naive Bayesian classifier. A numeric weight is inferred for each class. During discriminate classification, the naive Bayesian probability of a class is multiplied by its weight to obtain an adjusted value. The use of this adjusted value in place of the naive Bayesian probability is shown to significantly improve predictive accuracy.},
Audit-trail = {*},
Keywords = {Conditional Probability Estimation and Bayesian Learning},
Location = {Brisbane, Australia},
Related = {learning-complex-conditional-probabilities-from-data}
}
```

**ABSTRACT** Naive Bayesian classifiers utilise a simple mathematical model for induction. While it is known that the assumptions on which this model is based are frequently violated, the predictive accuracy obtained in discriminate classification tasks is surprisingly competitive in comparison to more complex induction techniques. Adjusted probability naive Bayesian induction adds a simple extension to the naive Bayesian classifier. A numeric weight is inferred for each class. During discriminate classification, the naive Bayesian probability of a class is multiplied by its weight to obtain an adjusted value. The use of this adjusted value in place of the naive Bayesian probability is shown to significantly improve predictive accuracy.